Friday, September 08, 2006

The Demise of Outline Planning Permission

If you want a good example of how our reforming government manages to make most things worse than they were before, you need look no further than what’s just happened to outline planning permissions.

Planning applications have traditionally fallen into two distinct categories, outline and detailed. You can’t build without detailed permission, but you can use outline to establish a right to build. Thus if you wanted to work out whether you could build a new house in your back garden, you could apply for outline permission and, if successful, that would give you three years to submit a detailed application for exactly what it was you wanted to build.

Now, traditionally, all you needed for an outline permission was a location plan at 1:1250 and a site plan at 1:500, with the site in question outlined in red. Anyone who could handle a photocopier had the skills to submit an outline application. If the site was difficult, there might have had to be some attention paid to things like parking or access but mostly it was just a red line on a map.

No more.

In future, outline permission will have to include information on the footprint to be developed, together with upper and lower limits on height, width and length of each and every new building. You will also have to submit information about the access arrangements. Now you can’t realistically do this without drawing up some sketches at the very least. Not only is this time consuming and expensive but it also restricts your options if and when outline planning is achieved.

One of the beauties of the old system was that you could start with a blank sheet of paper when it came to siting, sizing and detailing your house. OK, you would get involved in interminable discussions with the planners about what you could and couldn’t get away with, but at least you had the luxury of choice. Now you have to commit yourself to a shape, size and situation just to win outline permission. Just about all that would be left after this would be a few arguments over windows, bricks and roof tiles, the sort of details that used to be called reserved matters.

It’s hard to see who gains by these new rules.

The applicant is severely disadvantaged because they now have to undertake most of the design work on spec, without even knowing whether the scheme as a whole is even acceptable. Which, in turn, means that the resulting designs are likely to be much more timid and less challenging. And a lot of time and money will be wasted.

The other side of the coin is that the planners have much more negotiating power because they have the threat of throwing out the entire scheme now, where previously both sides knew that something could be built and that a compromise would have to emerge. But do the planners actually want or need this added elbow room? They are already snowed under with the workload from domestic applications, of which 90% get passed. This will only increase their workload because they will now have to make value judgments about whether the application in front of them merits approval based on God Knows What criteria and this in turn may well involve several applications on each site.

They might just as well have axed outline planning permissions altogether and be done with. But no, the pretence that the outline planning stage still exists is held onto, thus making a difficult task — obtaining planning permission — even more difficult, risky, time consuming and expensive. In other words, another classic New Labour reform. How do they do it?

Labels:

3 Comments:

Blogger CAD Services said...

Most enlightening information on outline planning.
Latest change August 06 I understand is in relation to approve full planning permission. If you wish to make any amendment you cannot do this by sending in revised plans and getting approval. Now you have to make a new application including another planning fee. I have been caught with this situation, I cannot find any self explanation articals but am interested if you added an additional window would you still need a new application?

3:00 pm  
Blogger lofthouse said...

This happened to me recently, but I assumed it was a local issue. I understand that as a result of a recent court case, which I assume the LA lost, they had allowed too much variation from a PP.
Way round it may be that the planners build in more tolerance in the form of more open conditions such as "window sizes and positions to be agreed in writing...blah blah

12:53 pm  
Blogger Zheng junxai5 said...

zhengjx20160803
coach factory outlet online
coach outlet store online clearances
nike store
copy watches
true religion jeans cheap
gucci outlet online
air jordan 11
fitflop clearance
coach outlet
christian louboutin pas cher
fitflop shoes
fitflops
cheap jerseys
polo ralph lauren
louis vuitton outlet stores
mont blanc pen
concords 11
michael kors handbags
toms wedges
coach factory outlet
cheap toms
michael kors handbags
air jordans
cheap louis vuitton handbags
nike air max uk
christian louboutin sale
oakley vault
longchamp outlet
ray bans
celine handbags
air jordan shoes
gucci belts
cheap oakleys
gucci bags
tory burch outlet online
louis vuitton outlet
fit flops
coach outlet store online
asics running shoes
christian louboutin sale clearance

2:29 am  

Post a Comment

<< Home