Monday, October 31, 2005

Caspar: a Halloween nightmare

A flagship off-site construction project in Leeds is being evacuated because of fears it will blow down in high winds. Caspar (pictured here) was built in Leeds six years ago by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF): it was one of the first of the new wave of prefabricated housing projects which the government has been so keen to promote. Oh dear. Oh very, very, dear.

Where did it all go wrong, John?

One of the key selling points for using off-site construction methods is that the amount of snagging is minimised. The aim is to hand over the new building “defect-free.” No doubt when Japanese contractors Kajima handed over the 45 flats that make up Caspar to the JRF for them to rent out as affordable homes for swinging Leeds singletons, much was made of the advantages of all this.

But, according to a report in this week’s Building, something’s obviously been amiss there for a long time because Arup, our premier building consultants, were hired to look into things, and Arup have said “Yipes – get out of there before the next storm.” What they’ve actually said is that there is a 2% chance that the whole building will collapse in high winds. JRF have even admitted that, if the cost of repairing the fault is excessive, they will consider demolishing the whole structure.

Is this the beginning of the end for modern methods of construction, just as the collapse of Ronan Point in 1968 marked the death-knell of system-build in the UK 40 years ago? It’s impossible to say. Caspar (stands for City-centre Apartments for Single People at Affordable Rents (neat or what!)) is just one of many such projects and, unlike Ronan Point, no one has been killed or even hurt. But the failure of Caspar does pose some very uncomfortable questions. Such as…

Why are so many of these schemes prototypes?

Why the curved roof? Doesn’t it look suspiciously like a wing!

Why the curved anything? I thought this was meant to be affordable housing.

Is this stuff really so very different to the 60s tower blocks?

Is it a design failure or is it, yet again, a workmanship issue?

This project was actually conceived as half-modular, half-flat pack. It was designed by Levitt Bernstein, an architects’ practice at the forefront of the new social housing, and factory-built by Volumetric in Bedfordshire. The superstructure was erected in less than three weeks. Each flat is 51m2 and cost £68.6k to build. That’s a typical outcome for these schemes. In other words, they are rather more expensive than conventional builds. They would become cheaper if we built thousands of them but we don’t. Every scheme is different. Every architect has a different spin to put on the concept of off-site construction.

And now here, in the brave new world of modular construction, we have an award-winning scheme about to be condemned.

Labels:

7 Comments:

Blogger casparleeds said...

As the name says i live in caspar leeds and guess what, we got evacuated on monday night!! What the articles don tell you is that it isnt the method of construction that is wrong, or that its a huge failure, there is nothing wrong with prefab. It was the human factor that went wrong. Im not going to do the blame game but if you leave module unprotected on site in the snow and rain for 3 days before putting it in the wrong place in the building, ie reinforced ground floor flats on the top floor your bound to have problems. subsidence doesnt help either. The good news is thats we are back home now waiting to find a new place to live in the city

2:24 pm  
Anonymous Francis Langley said...

This is really sad news. I hope they have a backup plan.
affordable housing bronx ny

6:39 am  
Blogger spynetwork21 said...

I think this is not a design failure but a workmanship issue.

investment property

9:13 am  
Blogger اميرة زماني said...


Furniture move
he majority of DIY home movers are really interesteD in knowing how to properly loaD their renteD moving vehicles so that the entire storage spACe is utilizeD in the Best possiBle way. نقل عفش بالرياض The main concern for families who have DeciDeD to move on their own still remains the Danger of choosing a moving truck with insufficient spACe for their Belongings. شركة شراء اثاث مستعمل بالرياض To complicate things further, even the right choice of a rental moving vehicle can easily turn out to Be a serious proBlem if the loaDing process is not Done the right way.افضل شركة نقل عفش بينبع AnD Believe us, leaving prizeD possessions BehinD or Being forceD to make two trips are two moving scenarios you Don’t really want to go through for various reasons.شركة نقل اثاث بجدة - افضل شركة نقل عفش بالمدينة المنورة
EveryBoDy knows that when given at the right time, gooD moving aDvice can mean the worlD to stresseD home movers, anD will prove to Be the Difference Between a successful house move anD a Disastrous proBlem-filleD relocation. افضل شركة تخزين اثاث بالرياض This is why, having alreaDy DescriBeD in Details the truck loaDing process anD the way to overcome its challenges, it’s only fair that we say a few worDs aBout how to unloaD a moving truck once you have reACheD your Destination.

10:48 pm  
Blogger khaled ali said...

شركة مكافحة الحمام بالدمام

10:45 pm  
Blogger stella said...


avriq.com
avriq.in

2:19 pm  
Blogger khairy said...




شركة كيان لنقل العفش
مدونة نقل العفش

شركة كيان من اهم شركات نقل العفش بالرياض نوفر لكم نقل اثاث بالرياض خبرة 20 عام في نقل العفش بالرياض مع اسعار رخيصة في نقل الاثاث بالرياض
شركة نقل عفش بالرياض
شركة نقل اثاث بالرياض
شركات نقل العفش بالرياض
نقل عفش بالرياض

2:43 am  

Post a Comment

<< Home